Oklahoma Supreme Court overrules doctrine of “caveat emptor” with respect to residential leases.

July 31st, 2009

Until June 30th, in the area of landlord tort liability for a tenant’s injuries within the leased premises, Oklahoma followed the common law maxim of “caveat emptor,” which states:  ”The right of possession and enjoyment of the leased premises passes to the lessee, in the absence of concealment or fraud by the landlord as to some defect in the premises known to him and unknown to the tenant, the rule of caveat emptor applies and the tenant takes the premises in whatever condition they may be in, thus assuming all risk of personal injury from defects therein.”   In its place, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has now imposed a general duty of care upon landlords to maintain the leased premises, including areas under the tenant’s exclusive control or use, in a reasonably safe condition. This duty requires a landlord to act reasonably when the landlord knew or reasonably should have known of the defective condition and had a reasonable opportunity to make repairs.

The full text of the Miller v Grace decision is available here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling impacts Oklahoma’s real estate industry.

July 31st, 2009

The Oklahoma Association of REALTORS® wants to inform you of a recent Opinion by the Oklahoma Supreme Court and its impact on Oklahoma ’s real estate industry.

On June 30, the Court issued an Opinion in Bowman v. Presley which reversed prior rulings and permitted a lawsuit by the buyers to go forward against both the sellers and the listing REALTORS® in a dispute over square footage.  REALTORS® who listed a house for sale with a stated square footage “per courthouse records” now have to defend, along with the sellers, the square foot amount even though they were just passing information on to buyer, according to a decision in a civil lawsuit brought by the buyers in Pottawatomie County.

The house at issue in the lawsuit was listed in 2005 as having 2,890 square feet, which matched the County Assessor ’s data. The house was listed for sale by a REALTOR® who was also the mother of the seller.  After closing, the buyers obtained a copy of their lender’s appraisal, which measured the house size at less than 2,200 square feet. The buyers also obtained an appraisal completed for the sellers five years earlier, from the same appraiser, which had also stated that the house was less than 2,200 square feet. A third appraisal by the same appraiser, also five years earlier, had indicated that the house was 2,468 square feet.  With so many different figures, the Court ruled that the issue of the house’s actual size was unclear.

The REALTORS® argued that the buyers had signed closing releases and had ample time to inspect and measure the house before closing.  The REALTORS® asserted that the listing information accurately quoted the Pottawatomie County Assessor’s data for tax assessment purposes and that the MLS listing included a disclaimer that the data presented might not be accurate. They also asserted that the purchase contract itself contained a disclaimer acknowledging that the REALTORS® would not be held responsible for inaccurate square footage information.

In its recent opinion, the Court held that the particular facts of the case raised a question of whether the REALTORS® had misrepresented the property size “unreasonably, recklessly or dishonestly.”  Bypassing the several disclaimers and releases, the Opinion implies that passing along inaccurate square footage data allows a negligence claim based on the licensee’s duties pursuant to the Real Estate License Code regardless of any contrary express contractual terms.  The Court’s decision allows the buyers a trial even if they saw a disclaimer by letting them challenge whether the REALTORS® knew or should have known, in the exercise of “reasonable skill and care,” that the courthouse information quoted in the MLS listing was inaccurate.

OAR is working on long term solutions to the issues raised by this decision.  We are exploring different ways of addressing these problems, including a potential legislative solution early next year.  In the meantime, here are some recommendations on different steps to protect against unexpected lawsuits, especially in a turbulent market in which buyers may regret their purchase if their house value appears to be falling.  Please note that these options might provide some protection, but there is no guarantee of removing all exposure.

1.      Be aware that different appraisers may apply the rules for measurement of a property differently. Never represent that a particular measurement is necessarily accurate.  Instead, always qualify any statement about size with terms such as “estimated,” “approximate,” “appraiser’s opinion,” “builder’s opinion” or “assessor’s opinion.”

2.      To avoid any and all potential liability altogether, a broker may choose not to quote square footage.  However, we understand that a discussion of square footage may play an important role in your day to day business, and many buyers may ask for this figure.  With this in mind, when providing “appraisal,” “builder’s plans” or, if you must, “courthouse” information as a source for square footage data, consider having buyers who present an offer sign an acknowledgment before the offer is accepted by the sellers, such as the following:

“I/we acknowledge that information provided to me from other sources, including, but not limited to, square footage estimates from prior appraisals, builder’s plans or courthouse tax records may be materially inaccurate due to various causes such as alterations to the property or errors in the methods used to calculate the information given. Square footage information provided is for the purpose of marketing, may not be exact and is NOT suitable for loan application, valuation or any other purpose. I/we acknowledge that the Offer being made to purchase ______[property description] is based on our personal viewing and opinion of the property and does not rely upon any information except as specifically contained in the Real Estate Purchase Contract.  I/we acknowledge that the both the Listing and Selling Brokers and/or Associates involved in the transaction do not warrant or make any representation concerning the accuracy of any information from third parties and acknowledge receipt of this information disclosure.”

3.      If providing estimated square footage is needed, use common sense when inputting MLS listing information. If experience has shown that courthouse records tend to be inaccurate, ask the seller to provide a copy of an appraisal or the builder’s plans to rely upon instead, and show the date of the appraisal or the plans.

  • Share/Bookmark

Haskell County Ten Commandments monument case won’t be reheard

July 31st, 2009

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent

Published: 7/31/2009  2:27 AM

Last Modified: 7/31/2009  5:04 AM

DENVER — A hotly divided appeals court narrowly let stand on Thursday last month’s decision against a Ten Commandments monument on the Haskell County Courthouse lawn.  Six of the 12 judges on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wanted to reconsider the June 8 decision of a three-judge panel of the court.  Four of them said the decision conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court precedent.  The three-judge panel of the Denver-based court had concluded that the primary effect of the 8-foot monument in Stigler is to endorse religion and that it therefore violates the Constitution.  The six judges who dissented were one short of the required majority to have all 12 judges reconsider the ruling.  ”The court’s decision in this case perpetuates a regrettable misapprehension: that recognition of the role of religion in this country’s founding, history, traditions and laws is to be strictly excluded from the civic sphere,” three of those judges stated in a dissenting opinion.  [Full text of opinion: Green v Haskell County 06-7098]

The six judges who voted not to reconsider the decision did not give a reason.  The three-judge panel had written in June that because of “the unique factual setting of a small community like Haskell County,” a reasonable observer would conclude that the county commissioners’ statements of support for the monument “reflect a government endorsement of religion.”  The monument was funded and constructed by Christians, the judges wrote. The county commissioners authorized it and referred to their Christian beliefs in support of it, the panel stated.

The county commissioners, who asked the full court to rehear the case, can now ask the U.S. Supreme Court to accept an appeal of the decision.

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent via Tulsa World: Commandments monument case won’t be reheard .

Haskell County Courthouse Monument

Ten Commandments on the Courthouse grounds in Stigler, Oklahoma.

  • Share/Bookmark

Landlord Sues Tenant for Libel Over Tweet About ‘Moldy Apartment’

July 29th, 2009

Posted Jul 28, 2009, 11:38 am CDT
By Sarah Randag

An apartment management company in Illinois has sued a tenant for libel over a “malicious and defamatory” tweet about the state of her apartment to her 20 followers on Twitter.

Chicago Bar-Tender has the complaint filed by Horizon Group Management against Amanda Bonnen, who was a tenant in one of its Chicago buildings. The complaint notes that the @abonnen account named in the complaint had only 20 followers (the account appears to no longer be live). The blog also has a screen shot of @abonnen’s May 12 tweet reply:

“You should just come anyway. Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you? Horizon realty thinks it’s OK.”

The Cook County Circuit Court complaint includes @abonnen’s entire Twitter feed between April 27 and July 13 as Exhibit A, and it notes that because the @abonnen account was public, “anybody in the world can view the account holder’s tweets.” The complaint contends that because the “statement damaged the plaintiff’s reputation in its business, the statement is libel per se.”

Horizon Realty Group issued a press release on July 28 in which general counsel Jeff Michael stated that Bonnen had filed suit against Horizon on July 24, and that Horizon had discovered the tweet while conducting due diligence in response to that suit.

The complaint seeks a jurisdictional amount of damages and contends that because Bonnen’s tweet is defamatory per se damages to the plaintiff’s reputation “are presumed.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Why the Biggest Firms Don’t Blog

July 22nd, 2009

Snob

“You don’t have to say much to set off an avalanche in the blogosphere,” observes James M. Beck, counsel in the Philadelphia office of Dechert, in a post yesterday at the blog Drug and Device Law, which he co-authors with Mark Herrmann, a partner in the Chicago office of Jones Day. In this case, the TNT that set off the avalanche was Herrmann’s observationin an earlier post that of the 10 U.S. firms with highest profits per partner, “only one has any connection to a blog. And that ‘connection’ is pretty remote.”

What prompted Hermann’s observation was the recent post at LexBlog on the state of the Am Law 200 blogosphere. It showed that 41 percent of the 200 largest firms now have blogs, a 110 percent increase from LexBlog’s first survey two years ago. But none of these blogs is published under the name of a top-10 firm. The closest tie any blog has to a top-10 firm is that one was founded by an associate at Kirkland & Ellis but is now written by a number of non-Kirkland contributors.

Herrmann’s observation brought any number of suggestions from readers as to why big firms don’t blog. Beck’s post sums up six of them:

1. Lawyers at the most profitable firms are stupid.

2. Lawyers at the most profitable firms are too busy.

3. Lawyers at those firms won’t stoop to blog.

4. Lawyers at those firms don’t want to give away their product for free.

5. Lawyers at those firms lack the necessary skill set.

6. Lawyers at those firms believe that blogging is unlikely to yield a decent return on investment.

Beck and Herrmann opt to report on the fray but stay out of it themselves. “Although we have a pretty strong opinion on this subject, we’re keeping it to ourselves,” Beck writes. But at the blog Strategic Legal Technology, Ron Friedmann is more than happy to weigh in with his take, “that blogs are among the most cost-effective approaches to marketing for lawyers.” In light of the current legal market depression, he says, “BigLaw will have to grab for market share.” When that time comes, he suggests, we’ll see how long it takes for the hold-outs to hop on the blogging bandwagon.

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on July 7, 2009 at 01:14 PM

  • Share/Bookmark

How To Practice Law Out Of A Back Pack

July 10th, 2009

By: Alfred K. “Kent” Morlan

When I entered law school in 1969, the legal world was about highly cross-referenced books, electric typewriters, fax machines and telephones.  Law libraries were the intellectual warehouses of the legal world and Corpus Juris Secundum, Digests, Annotated Statutes, Reporters, etc. were the units of storage in which lawyers delved to find the law that they needed to practice.  Nothing much had changed for nearly a century and nothing much would change until about 10 years after I graduated from law school and began practicing law.  The development of the personal computer in the late 1970s and early 1980s was the beginning of the end of what had become an accepted operational paradigm for the legal profession.

In 1983 or 1984, I, like many others, became aware of the marketing of the IBM PC.  While on a trip to California, I was a guest in an old friend’s house and he had recently purchased a Compaq computer.  It looked like a portable Singer sewing machine when it was closed up for transportation and weighed in at 33 pounds or so.  It had two 5.25 inch floppy disk drives and 64 megs of memory.  My friend let me play with his new toy and by the end of the weekend, I was convinced that the personal computer was going to change everything.  While passing through John Wayne Airport on the way back home, I bought every computer magazine that they had and began re-educating myself about computers that I had been trained to repair by the United States Air Force in the 1960s.

Eventually, I asked my law firm to buy me a computer and they looked at me as if I were suffering from a mental illness.  In their collective opinions, no lawyer would ever directly use such technology to practice law.  I eventually used my own money to buy a computer and began using some software products called PFS to write letters, store data and build spreadsheets.  I still use one of the software programs that I bought in the 1980s but will probably not be able to do so with the next version of Microsoft’s operating system.  By 1991 when I left the firm, some of the lawyers and all of the secretaries and paralegals were on a network of personal computers and the firm was upgrading and expanding its computer system on a daily basis.  By that time, legal materials were available via dial up systems and CD-Rom libraries were beginning to become available.  The 33 pound Compaq had been replaced with a 13 pound Toshiba.  Most lawyers were still essentially tied to desktops.

A lot has changed since I left that firm to start my own solo practice in 1991.  One of the most significant was, of course, the Internet.  It has changed almost everything.  In the science fiction novel “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy written by Douglas Adams, Ford Prefect, an alien, who befriends Englishman Arthur Dent and saves him when the Earth is destroyed to make way for a galactic highway. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy was an electronic encyclopedia about everything. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy originally aired as a radio show on the BBC in 1978 and everyone found the idea of a device that could hold everything known about everything to be amusing and preposterous. Well, as I said, a lot has changed.

Today, with a Wi-Fi equipped laptop, a cell phone and one of the smaller inkjet printers on the market, it is literally possible to practice law anywhere in the United States, if not the world.   For example, I ran into an oil and gas lawyer at the courthouse recently and he told me that he took a vacation to Vietnam and was able to sit on the beach and write oil and gas title opinions.  I now have two laptops that are capable to connecting to the Internet in airports, restaurants and a lot of other hotspots or can access the Internet via a wireless cell phone card at DSL speeds about anywhere my cell phone can communicate while sitting still or traveling down the Interstate at 70+ mph.  In addition, I recently purchased a SIP phone that will allow me to make and receive telephone calls anywhere the phone can acquire an IP.

Back in the 1980s, I proposed to the Bar Association that it recommend that the Legislature enact a statute authorizing the filing of pleadings faxed to a courthouse in lieu of having to file an original document.  The Bar and the Legislature both concurred and the statute can be found in Title 12.  The Federal Courts resisted claiming that they had to have documents signed with ink pens by the sponsoring lawyer.  How times have changed. The Federal Courts now insist that pleadings be filed electronically and that no paper be filed at all with a few exceptions.  While the state courts have not kept up in this regard, it is still possible to fax a pleading to the law libraries in Oklahoma and Tulsa Counties and they will, for a fee, file your pleading with the clerk for you.

So, what has the modern era produced that now makes it possible to practice law out of a back pack?  Wi-Fi and the Internet!  Unlike a lot of other areas, where Oklahoma ranks at or near the bottom of the economic/social pile when compared to other states, Oklahoma ranks “Number One” when it comes to access to legal information online.  OSCN.net is clearly the best web site of its kind in the United States.  That Oklahoma elected to incorporate every appellate court decisions ever rendered in Oklahoma in the site makes it unique among the jurisdictions for building a free integrated legal information system for everyone to use.  Having access to the court dockets, statutes, rules, etc. via the Internet, when combined with other free public access legal information, makes it possible for a lawyer access the information that is essential for the successful practice of the law.

The laptop computer and the cell phone are the two essential ingredients for the mobile or virtual practice of the law.  Laptops are available in various configurations starting at about $800 or less for a reasonably configured machine that is capable of doing most of what an attorney needs to do, other than play.  While laptops cost more than desktops for equivalent power and features, they lend themselves to the practice of law because they go where the lawyer goes.  The practice of law is, of course, an intellectual function and except for the work products, e.g., letters, pleadings, motions, briefs, etc., everything goes on in the lawyers head.  It is, therefore, possible to effectively practice law anywhere if it is possible to communicate with clients, opposing counsel, the courts, etc. and to produce work products digitally or on paper.  A laptop can have a keyboard, mouse, monitor and printer plugged into it in the office and can be unplugged and transported anywhere any time.  Even if one elects to use a desktop model in one’s office, a laptop can be used as a backup device connected to an office network and can have everything on it that a lawyer’s desktop computer has on it at the end of the day.  The new thumb drives that are now available can be used to backup and move information from one computer to another so the computer upon which work product is produced is not terribly relevant any more.

Padded back packs and brief cases with and without wheels are now sold in most office supply stores.  I recently bought a Swiss Gear computer back pack at Sam’s for $40.00.  The same bag is available from Office Depot at about $80.00.  Targus deluxe leather notebook cases with wheels costs $83 and any traditional brief case can be converted into a suitable laptop bag with the addition of some foam rubber.

Another element of a mobile law office is the ability to print documents locally.  Canon and HP both make compact printers designed for road warriors.  The Canon iP90v portable inkjet Photo Printer is priced at $260.00.  While pricy for an inkjet printer, it will fit in a back pack or brief case with a laptop.  Similar products are available from all of the major printer manufacturers at similar prices.

A cell phone is also an essential for any lawyer who wants to stay in touch with his or her office, clients, wife and/or kids.  Nearly everyone who is anyone has a cell phone.  I recently stopped by a local AT&T store to check prices on new phones and with rebates, etc. on a two year contract, could get a cell phone at a cost of from $10 to $500.  Almost every cell phone now comes equipped with a camera and the G3 models can perform all kinds of functions including acting as a wireless access point for your laptop for about $50 a month or you can purchase a wireless card for laptop and access the Internet at DSL speeds for the same $50 per month on a two year contract.  I have looked at the IPhone, Blackberry and the new Palm Pre.  Many of my techie friends love the IPhone but business people seem to still like the Blackberry.  The Palm Pre is so new that there isn’t much being said about it.  I read an article recently that basically said that the IPhone is the smart phone of choice in the market today.

Once you have selected your laptop, your printer, your cell phone and a back pack or brief case in which to tote your office around, you will need to be connected to the Internet.  At home you probably already have a DSL or cable connection to the Internet but just like a traditional office, you can only use it at home.  You can, if you are cheap, use AT&T’s dial up system to access the Internet is you can find a phone to use or want to attached your laptop to your cell phone using a cable.  AT&T has access points about everywhere in the United States.  I use to use these numbers to get on the Internet when away from home before free Internet access became available in about every motel in the country.  For the really frugal, many coffee shops and other public places provide free Internet access to attract customers.  Visit any Paneras, Starbucks, McDonalds, etc. and you can probably get online for free using the Wi-Fi built into your computer.  If you are going to be really mobile and want to be able to get on the Internet anytime and about anywhere, you will want to look at the subscribing to one of the wireless access services provided by AT&T, Sprint and Verison.  With a two year commitment and a small upfront charge for the wireless card that is required to utilize one of these services, you can have access to the Internet about anywhere a cell phone works for about $50 a month.

If you want to fax directly off of your laptop, consider subscribing to eFax or one of the other fax services.  eFax Plus costs only $16.95 (USD) a month, with a one-time $10.00 (USD) fee to activate your number. You get 130 pages of incoming faxes and 30 pages of outgoing faxes free each month. After that, incoming faxes cost $0.15 (USD) a page and outgoing faxes cost $0.10 (USD) a page to numbers in the U.S.  Other services are available from other vendors for about the same cost per month.  This is much less expensive than having a dedicated line with a fax machine attached to it and you get your faxes by eMail anywhere in the world. For about $30 you can add a web camera if you have clients who want to talk to you face-to-face over the Internet.

If you do not want to answer your own phone, the telecommunications industry in rapidly coming to your rescue.  A number of services have sprung up recently that offer to have a real human answer your phone for you and transfer your calls to you’re your home office and/or cell phone or into a voicemail box that will send you a copy of the voice mail message as an attachment to an e-mail.

Oklahoma lawyers are blessed with OSCN and the outstanding access that it makes available to everyone.  The Oklahoma Bar Association is now supplementing what the Supreme Court Net is providing access to Bar Association members to FastCase® free of charge.  “Fastcase® is the premiere American provider of online legal research. The company’s patent-pending research software helps busy legal professionals sort through the clutter, ranking the best cases and statutes first, and enabling users to re-sort search results to find answers fast. Fastcase® puts the whole American law library on the desktop — providing online access to millions of cases, statutes, and regulations, and at a fraction of the cost of existing alternatives. Fastcase®  is an American company based in Washington, D.C. and founded in 1999. It was built by lawyers for lawyers, with the input of specialists in legal research, library science, and law.”

If you want more legal resources available from your laptop and OSC and the Oklahoma Bar Association provide for free, WestLaw®, LexisNexis® and LoisLaw® all stand ready and willing to provide you with at value added extra research edge that you may think that you need to make your legal research complete.  A LoisLaw® subscription to its Oklahoma Library plus of the federal circuits and federal materials is currently $110 a month.  LoisLaw’s national library is currently priced at $140 a month.  West and LexisNexis are more expensive and have various kinds of plans to suit individual attorney’s needs.

The marketing of legal services, like everything else, is migrating from paper to the Internet.  Martindale-Hubbell, which has never been a good marketing strategy for the solo or small firm practice lawyer, no longer even publishes books to my knowledge.  LexisNexis developed Lawyers.com to complete with Thomson’s FindLaw.com.  Switchboard  and others Internet companies provide of local online advertising solutions and Internet-based yellow pages, interconnecting consumers, merchants and national advertisers. These services claim to make it easy for consumers to quickly and easily find and compare local businesses offering specific products and services, while creating revenue opportunities for merchants. Switchboard is a wholly owned subsidiary of InfoSpace, Inc.  Marketing digitally can cost nothing via the Oklahoma Bar Association’s Find-A-Lawyer service, on MoreLaw.com and other places on the Internet.  Other services like Martindale, FindLaw, Lawyers.com, etc. vary in price but generally cost more than $100

As you have probably concluded, it is my opinion that it is possible to practice law out of a back pack or a brief case without any problem.  All of the technical and research resources that you might need are readily and inexpensively available off the shelf in about any office supply store in the United States.  It is also possible to have an office without having an office.  There are various reasons for not telling your clients that you office out of a back pack or your home.  This is not seen as being “professional” by some and there are certainly reasons for not having some clients come to your home office.  A number of years ago, my wife and I created a legal executive suite in Tulsa where we rent real and virtual offices to lawyers and other legal service providers.  More than half of our tenants are “virtual tenants” which means we make it look like they have real offices with us with when they do not, in fact, rent an office.  They rent the use of the common areas in our office including the reception area, kitchen, conference rooms, etc.  We make it look like they have a physical office in our office by listing them on the roster of the building and treating them and their clients just like we treat the lawyer who rent physical offices and their clients.  For a very reasonable monthly fee, Beacon 400 LLC d/b/a MoreLaw Suites will provide the office façade that the home office based lawyer needs to project the professional image that they want to their clients.

The legal playing field is leveler today for the solo and small firm practice lawyer.  Technology continues to become less and less expensive over time and the Internet has made information, including legal research materials, easy and inexpensive to access.  Place is becoming less and less important to the practice of law and there is no reason why a solo practice lawyer should have to pay thousands in overhead costs for a traditional law office just for appearances.  You can now pack an entire law office into a back pack and practice law just about anywhere.

© 2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.. All Rights Reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

Happy fourth of July!

July 1st, 2009

Huddleston Law Offices remembers all those who fought for our independence.  Have fun with your families and, if you’re not in the USA, back to work!

NEWS from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Office of Information and Public Affairs Washington, DC 20207

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Release # 09-258

CPSC Announces Drop in Fireworks-Related Injuries; Consumers Still Urged To Celebrate Safe This July 4th CPSC Introduces the New Face of Safety – Chairman Inez Tenenbaum

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s new Chairman, Inez Tenenbaum, urged families today to put safety first during the Fourth of July holiday and celebrate with caution when it comes to fireworks. The latest report (PDF) from CPSC indicates that there were reports of seven fireworks-related deaths and an estimated 7,000 hospital emergency room treated injuries in 2008. In 2007, CPSC had reports of eleven deaths and an estimated 9,800 injuries.

Chairman Tenenbaum, in a press event and fireworks demonstration on the National Mall, reminded consumers that even with fewer reported deaths and injuries in 2008, the one-month period surrounding the Fourth of July is still the most dangerous time. In fact, 70 percent of all fireworks-related injuries occurred between June 20 and July 20.

“CPSC wants to keep reducing fireworks-related deaths and injuries in 2009,” said Chairman Tenenbaum. “Children should never play with or light fireworks, and adults should watch our demonstrations to see how powerful and dangerous illegal fireworks can be.”

Chairman Tenenbaum was joined on the National Mall by Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice; Dan Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Trade within Customs and Border Protection (CBP); and Joseph Riehl, Acting Assistant Director of the Office of Enforcement Programs and Services for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

CPSC continues to work to keep American families safe by educating the public about the risk of injury associated with fireworks, enforcing fireworks regulations, and prosecuting dealers and distributors who manufacture and sell illegal explosives.

As a part of its fireworks enforcement program, CPSC actively works with ATF to investigate roadside stands, warehouses and retail stores that sell professional grade explosives to consumers, and homes that serve as havens for the manufacture of dangerous fireworks devices. These investigations have resulted in dozens of successful prosecutions by the Justice Department’s Office of Consumer Litigation and U.S. Attorney offices across the country.

On June 19, 2009, a federal judge in the Eastern District of New York sentenced Jon Cea and Vincent Cea to 24 months and 36 months in federal prison, respectively, after they pleaded guilty to conspiracy to engage in the business of dealing in explosive materials, involving the illegal sale of more than 1,000 pounds of explosives. The defendants and their customers were not licensed, yet they purchased and sold professional display fireworks. CPSC and the Justice Department worked in partnership on this case.

At the ports, CPSC is working alongside CBP to ensure shipments are in compliance with the federal regulations. With CBP assistance, last year CPSC staff found through sampling and testing of fireworks shipments that forty-nine percent of these shipments contained illegal fireworks.

While the federal government remains committed to stopping the manufacture and sale of illegal fireworks, CPSC encourages consumers who decide to purchase legal fireworks to:

* Never allow young children to play with or ignite fireworks.

* Make sure fireworks are legal in your area before buying or using them.

* Avoid buying fireworks that come in brown paper packaging, as this can often be a sign that the fireworks were made for professional displays and could pose a danger to consumers.

* Adults should always supervise fireworks activities. Parents often don’t realize that there are many injuries from sparklers to children under five. Sparklers burn at temperatures of about 2,000 degrees – hot enough to melt some metals.

* Never have any portion of your body directly over a fireworks device when lighting the fuse. Move back a safe distance immediately after lighting.

* Never try to re-light or pick up fireworks that have not fully functioned.

* Never point or throw fireworks at another person.

* Keep a bucket of water or a garden hose handy in case of fire or other mishap.

* Light one item at a time, then move back quickly.

* Never carry fireworks in a pocket or shoot them off in metal or glass containers.

* After fireworks fully complete their functioning, douse the spent device with plenty of water from a bucket or hose before discarding to prevent a trash fire.

To see this release on CPSC’s web site, please go to: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09258.html

********************************************************

CPSC is still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product. Please tell us about it: https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from thousands of types of consumer products under the agency’s jurisdiction. The CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children. The CPSC’s work to ensure the safety of consumer products – such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals – contributed significantly to the 30 percent decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.

To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, call CPSC’s hotline at (800) 638-2772 or CPSC’s teletypewriter at (800) 638-8270. To join a CPSC email subscription list, please go to www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx. Consumers can obtain this release and recall information at CPSC’s Web site at www.cpsc.gov.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Visit Brian on LinkedIn

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Enter your email address here for updates:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

© 2009 Huddleston Law Offices