Google Offers Legal Research for the Average Citizen—and Lawyers, Too

November 30th, 2009

As many of us recall from our civics lessons in school, the United States is a common law country. That means when judges issue opinions in legal cases, they often establish precedents that will guide the rulings of other judges in similar cases and jurisdictions. Over time, these legal opinions build, refine and clarify the laws that govern our land. For average citizens, however, it can be difficult to find or even read these landmark opinions.

  • Share/Bookmark

Breaking News: Congress Extends, Expands Housing Tax Credit

November 5th, 2009

House approves extension by vote of 402-12; buyers now have until June 30, 2010 to close on a home.

By: Alison Rice

Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday voted 402-12 to approve an extension and expansion of the popular housing tax credit and, they hope, supporting the fragile housing market until the economy improves. The Senate passed the measure 98-0 Wednesday; the bill will now go to the White House, where President Obama is expected to sign it.

Builders, who say the tax credit has revived their buyer traffic and sales in a very difficult year, promptly celebrated.

“We commend lawmakers for acting in a bipartisan manner to extend the first-time home buyer tax credit beyond its Nov. 30 deadline and expand it to a wider group of home buyers,” said Joe Robson, who is chairman of the National Association of Home Builders and a builder in Tulsa, Okla. “The tax credit has proven to be a powerful economic incentive. Today’s action by Congress will further stabilize housing and the economy by creating new jobs, stimulating home sales, reducing foreclosures, cutting excess inventories and stabilizing home prices.”

Mortgage bankers agreed. “At a time when we are finally starting to see some signs of life in the housing and mortgage markets, extending and expanding the home buyer tax credit is a critical step to keeping the momentum,” said Robert E. Story, Jr., who chairs the Washington, D.C.-based Mortgage Bankers Association.

The tax credit approved today will take the housing market into the critical spring selling season. To receive the credit, buyers must sign a purchase agreement by April 30, 2010, and close on the home by June 30, 2010.  As was the case with the credit that has been in use for most of this year, the extended credit will provide first-time home buyers up to $8,000, depending on the price of the home and their household income.

But there are several important differences, too. The newly approved tax credit also covers people who have lived in their homes for at least five years; they can claim a credit of up to $6,500 if they purchase a new home. Finally, Congress raised the income limits on the program, which will now allow singles who make up to $125,000 and married couples with a household income of $225,000 to be eligible for the credit.

The new version of the credit has a price tag for the government of $10.8 billion in lost taxes.

Alison Rice is senior editor, online, at BUILDER magazine.

  • Share/Bookmark

Suit Claims That Redbox Charges Late Fees Despite Promise Not to

November 2nd, 2009

Amanda Bronstad

11-02-2009

A class action has been filed against Redbox Automated Retail LLC on behalf of consumers who claim they were charged late fees on DVD rentals, even though the kiosk retailer advertises that it does not charge late fees.

The suit comes as Redbox, a subsidiary of Coinstar Inc., has filed suits against three Hollywood studios asserting antitrust violations.

Redbox, which was founded in 2002, rents DVDs through 17,000 kiosks nationwide via venues including Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and McDonald’s Corp.

Laurie Piechur, a resident of St. Clair, Ill., who claims to have rented numerous DVDs from Redbox during the past year, said she was charged “excessive and illegal late fees,” along with a “maximum charge” of $25 after she did not return two videos, “Fool’s Gold” and “27 Dresses,” on time. She filed the suit against Redbox on Oct. 21 in St. Clair County, Ill., Circuit Court.

“While it boasts ‘easy $1 a night DVD Rentals’ ‘[w]ith no late fees … ever’ that is not the truth,” the suit says. “Instead, Redbox charges its customers who return a movie even one minute late a late fee in the form of an illegal penalty.”

Specifically, she said, if a customer does not return a video by 9 p.m. on the day following the rental, Redbox charges that customer another $1 for renting the video the second day. Under this scenario, she said, “Redbox can effectively double, if not triple, its revenue on a single DVD, with virtually no increase in its costs, thus in fact closely matching the point of sales price of its competitors, meaning Redbox is not a lower-cost alternative at all.”

After 24 days, the customer can keep the DVD, but Redbox issues a maximum charge of $25 — a price that is “much higher than compared to retail prices for the same disc, which would not be previously viewed or used,” the suit says.

Since Jan. 1, 2002, the fees have amounted to $100 million dollars, according to the complaint.

The suit seeks damages for violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, the Illinois Rental-Purchase Agreement Act and the Automatic Contract Renewal Act, as well as for unlawful penalties and unjust enrichment. The suit was filed on behalf of two sets of nationwide classes: Those who paid $1 to rent a DVD for one night but were charged a $1 fee after returning the disc after 9 p.m. the following day, and those who were charged $25 for failing to return a DVD.

Thomas Maag, a lawyer at Wendler Law in Edwardsville, Ill., who represents Piechur, and Chris Goodrich, a spokesman for Redbox, which is based in Oakbrook Terrace, Ill., declined to comment.

Redbox has filed suits against Universal Studios Home Entertainment, Warner Home Video and 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, alleging that the studios have established an illegal monopoly over the DVD market and are violating §1 of the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust law. The studios have disputed those claims in court.

Copyright 2009. ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.

Page printed from: http://www.law.com

  • Share/Bookmark

10th Circuit Court of Appeals: Haskell County 10 Commandments Monument must go

August 22nd, 2009

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent

Published: 8/22/2009  2:26 AM

Last Modified: 8/22/2009  3:44 AM

DENVER — Haskell County commissioners lost another battle Friday in their ongoing court fight to have a Ten Commandments monument remain on the courthouse lawn in Stigler.

A federal appeals court denied a request that the commissioners said was intended to avoid the unnecessary cost of prematurely removing the monument, which the court declared unconstitutional in June.

The officials had wanted the court to delay implementing its decision so that the county wouldn’t have to remove the monument before the U.S. Supreme Court decides whether it will accept the county’s appeal.

Judges of the Denver-based 10th Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 against staying the ruling. The commissioners asked for the stay Tuesday, a day after U.S. District Judge Ronald White in Muskogee ordered them to remove the 8-foot-tall monument. White’s order did not give a deadline for the monument’s removal. He was required to issue a judgment in accord with the appeals court’s June 8 decision because the lawsuit challenging the monument is in his court.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma and a Haskell County resident sued to have the monument removed shortly after it was erected in 2004. The appellate judges agreed 3-0 in June with the ACLU and resident James W. Green that the monument violates the U.S. Constitution because its primary effect is to endorse religion.

The commissioners on Tuesday told the judges that a “recall and stay of the mandate is appropriate to preserve the status quo until the case has run its final course.” It is expected to be months before the Supreme Court decides whether to hear the county’s appeal. The judges of the appeals court split 6-6 on July 30, denying the commissioners’ request for the full court to reconsider the June decision of a three-judge panel.

The Supreme Court accepts appeals in only about 2 percent of the cases it is asked to review. Attorneys for the commissioners contend that the Stigler case has a strong chance of being accepted by the high court.

The commissioners argued in Tuesday’s request that the tie vote and the “spirited” position of judges who favored rehearing the case “illustrate that this case is a good candidate for Supreme Court review.” But attorney Daniel Mach of the ACLU said previously that “the Court of Appeals got it right. There’s no reason for the Supreme Court to take this case.”

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent

via Tulsa World: Court: Monument must go .

  • Share/Bookmark

Black & Decker Coffeemakers Recalled By Applica Consumer Products Due to Burn Hazard

August 18th, 2009

NEWS from CPSC

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Office of Information and Public Affairs Washington, DC 20207



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 18, 2009
Release # 09-309
Firm’s Recall Hotline: (866) 699-4595
CPSC Recall Hotline: (800) 638-2772
CPSC Media Contact: (301) 504-7908

Black & Decker Coffeemakers Recalled By Applica Consumer Products Due to Burn Hazard

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed.Name of Product: Black & Decker® Thermal Coffeemakers

Units: About 9,800

Distributor: Applica Consumer Products Inc., of Miramar, Fla.

Hazard: The coffeemakers can overheat and melt, posing a burn hazard to consumers.

Incidents/Injuries: The firm has received one report of a coffeemaker melting. No injuries reported.

Description: This recall involves Black & Decker 8-cup programmable thermal coffeemakers. Model number TCM1000IKT is printed on the rating plate on the bottom of the coffeemaker.

Sold at: Walmart and small retail stores nationwide from April 2008 through July 2009 for between $50 and $65.

Manufactured in: China

Remedy: Consumer should immediately stop using the coffeemakers and contact Applica to receive a free replacement household product.

Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact Applica at (866) 699-4595 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, or visit the firm’s Web site at www.acprecall.com

Picture of Recalled Thermal Coffeemaker

CPSC is still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product. Please tell us about it by visiting https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx

Send the link for this page to a friend! The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from thousands of types of consumer products under the agency’s jurisdiction. The CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard. The CPSC’s work to ensure the safety of consumer products – such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals – contributed significantly to the decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.

To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury, call CPSC’s Hotline at (800) 638-2772 or CPSC’s teletypewriter at (800) 638-8270. To join a CPSC e-mail subscription list, please go tohttps://www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx. Consumers can obtain recall and general safety information by logging on to CPSC’s Web site at www.cpsc.gov.

  • Share/Bookmark

What is a Transfer-on-Death (“TOD”) Deed?

August 17th, 2009

The Nontestamentary Transfer of Property Act (“Act”), set forth in 58 O.S.Supp.2008, §§ 1251 – 1258, allows a record owner of an interest in real estate to designate who will receive

invest_article_20081101_2

a transfer of the interest in the future, effective upon the owner’s death. The transfer is accomplished by recording a Transfer-on-Death Deed (“TOD”). Interests in “minerals” 16 O.S.2001, §§ 61 – 68, constitute an interest in real estate transferable pursuant to the Act. See, OAG Opinion 2009 OK AG 6.

The TOD deed designates the person(s) who are to become the owners of the property after the owner’s death, all without a probate proceeding. Like payable on death financial accounts, the owner can change this designation any time by recording with the appropriate real estate records office a document which changes the beneficiary designation. This change does not require any consent or approval of the beneficiary. Prior to the enactment of this new law, if an owner of real estate attached someone else’s name to the ownership of real estate, that “someone else” would have an ownership interest in the property and would be entitled to a share of the sale proceeds, and that “someone else’s” signature and consent would be needed in order to sell or refinance the property. Consequently, it is risky for owners to place their children’s names on the title to their home, or on any other realty they own.

The key benefit of the TOD deed is that the real estate doesn’t have to go through probate court proceedings upon the death of the record owner, saving your family time and money. After the death(s) of the Grantor Owner(s), the following documents must be filed with the county recording office in which the Transfer on Death Deed was originally recorded:

  • A TRANSFER ON DEATH AFFIDAVIT of Identity and Survivorship, which identifies that the Grantee Beneficiary or Beneficiaries survived the deaths of all the Grantor Owners.
  • Certified Copies of Death Certificates for each of the Grantor Owners.

Oklahoma’s law authorizing TOD deeds took effect on November 1, 2008.

The enactment of the transfer-on-death deed statute provides a low cost alternative to probate, as well as to many other problematic methods of property transfer, benefiting clients and simplifying the real property transfer system.

  • Share/Bookmark

Oklahoma Supreme Court overrules doctrine of “caveat emptor” with respect to residential leases.

July 31st, 2009

Until June 30th, in the area of landlord tort liability for a tenant’s injuries within the leased premises, Oklahoma followed the common law maxim of “caveat emptor,” which states:  ”The right of possession and enjoyment of the leased premises passes to the lessee, in the absence of concealment or fraud by the landlord as to some defect in the premises known to him and unknown to the tenant, the rule of caveat emptor applies and the tenant takes the premises in whatever condition they may be in, thus assuming all risk of personal injury from defects therein.”   In its place, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has now imposed a general duty of care upon landlords to maintain the leased premises, including areas under the tenant’s exclusive control or use, in a reasonably safe condition. This duty requires a landlord to act reasonably when the landlord knew or reasonably should have known of the defective condition and had a reasonable opportunity to make repairs.

The full text of the Miller v Grace decision is available here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Haskell County Ten Commandments monument case won’t be reheard

July 31st, 2009

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent

Published: 7/31/2009  2:27 AM

Last Modified: 7/31/2009  5:04 AM

DENVER — A hotly divided appeals court narrowly let stand on Thursday last month’s decision against a Ten Commandments monument on the Haskell County Courthouse lawn.  Six of the 12 judges on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wanted to reconsider the June 8 decision of a three-judge panel of the court.  Four of them said the decision conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court precedent.  The three-judge panel of the Denver-based court had concluded that the primary effect of the 8-foot monument in Stigler is to endorse religion and that it therefore violates the Constitution.  The six judges who dissented were one short of the required majority to have all 12 judges reconsider the ruling.  ”The court’s decision in this case perpetuates a regrettable misapprehension: that recognition of the role of religion in this country’s founding, history, traditions and laws is to be strictly excluded from the civic sphere,” three of those judges stated in a dissenting opinion.  [Full text of opinion: Green v Haskell County 06-7098]

The six judges who voted not to reconsider the decision did not give a reason.  The three-judge panel had written in June that because of “the unique factual setting of a small community like Haskell County,” a reasonable observer would conclude that the county commissioners’ statements of support for the monument “reflect a government endorsement of religion.”  The monument was funded and constructed by Christians, the judges wrote. The county commissioners authorized it and referred to their Christian beliefs in support of it, the panel stated.

The county commissioners, who asked the full court to rehear the case, can now ask the U.S. Supreme Court to accept an appeal of the decision.

By ROBERT BOCZKIEWICZ World Correspondent via Tulsa World: Commandments monument case won’t be reheard .

Haskell County Courthouse Monument

Ten Commandments on the Courthouse grounds in Stigler, Oklahoma.

  • Share/Bookmark

DONOVAN ANNOUNCES RECOVERY ACT’S HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT CAN IMMEDIATELY HELP THOUSANDS OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS TO BUY A HOME

June 16th, 2009

HUD No. 09-072

Lemar Wooley

(202) 708-0685

www.hud.gov/news/index.cfm For Release

FHA plan will stimulate new home sales and help stabilize housing market

WASHINGTON – Speaking to the National Association of Home Builders Spring Board of Directors Meeting, U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will allow homebuyers to apply the Obama Administration’s new $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit toward the purchase costs of a FHA-insured home. Donovan said that today’s action will help stabilize the nation’s housing market by stimulating home sales across the country.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 offers homebuyers a tax credit of up to $8,000 for purchasing their first home. Families can only access this credit after filing their tax returns with the IRS. Today’s announcement details FHA’s rules allowing state Housing Finance Agencies and certain non-profits to “monetize” up to the full amount of the tax credit (depending on the amount of the mortgage) so that borrowers can immediately apply the funds toward their down payments. Home buyers using FHA-approved lenders can apply the tax credit to their down payment in excess of 3.5 percent of appraised value or their closing costs, which can help achieve a lower interest rate. To read the FHA’s new mortgagee letter, visit HUD’s website or click here.

“We believe this is a real win for everyone,” said Donovan. “Today, the Obama Administration is taking another important step toward accelerating the recovery of the nation’s housing market. Families will now be able to apply their anticipated tax credit toward their home purchase right away. At the same time we are putting safeguards in place to ensure that consumers will be protected from unscrupulous lenders. What we’re doing today will not only help these families to purchase their first home but will present an enormous benefit for communities struggling to deal with an oversupply of housing.”

Currently, borrowers applying for an FHA-insured mortgage are required to make a minimum 3.5 percent downpayment on the purchase of their home. Current law does not permit approved lenders to monetize the tax credit to meet the required 3.5 percent minimum down payment, but, under the terms of today’s announcement, lenders can now monetize the tax credit for use as additional down payment, or for other closing costs, which can help achieve a lower interest rate. Buyers financing through state Housing Finance Agencies and certain non-profits will be able to use the tax credit for their downpayments via secondary financing provided by the HFA or non-profit. In addition to the borrower’s own cash investment, FHA allows parents, employers and other governmental entities to contribute towards the downpayment. Today’s action permits the first-time homebuyer’s anticipated tax credit under the Recovery Act to be applied toward the family’s home purchase right away. Unlike seller-funded down-payment assistance, which was a vehicle for abuse, this program will allow homebuyers to shop for the best home price and services using their anticipated tax credit.

According to estimates by the National Association of Home Builders, the Administration’s homebuyer tax credit will stimulate 160,000 home sales across the nation – 101,000 of which will be first-time buyers who will receive the credit. Another 59,000 existing homeowners will be able to buy another home because a first-time buyer purchased their home. Given FHA’s current market share, it’s estimated that thousands of families will be able to purchase a home by allowing the anticipated tax credit to be applied toward their purchase together with an FHA-insured mortgage.

Homebuyers should beware of mortgage scams and carefully compare benefits and costs when seeking out tax credit monetization services. Programs will vary from organization to organization and borrowers should consider whether the services make sense for them, as well as what company offers the most suitable and affordable option.

For every FHA borrower who is assisted through the tax credit program, FHA will collect the name and employer identification number of the organization providing the service as well as associated fees and charges. FHA will use this information to track the business closely and will refer any questionable practices to the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary.

###

HUD is the nation’s housing agency committed to sustaining homeownership; creating affordable housing opportunities for low-income Americans; and supporting the homeless, elderly, people with disabilities and people living with AIDS. The Department also promotes economic and community development and enforces the nation’s fair housing laws. More information about HUD and its programs is available on the Internet at www.hud.gov and espanol.hud.gov.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Any-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit

June 16th, 2009

By: DIANA GOLOBAY

A new bill introduced in the House Thursday, HR  2801 or Home Ownership Moves the Economy (HOME) Act of 2009, aims to make the current $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit available to literally anyone that purchases a primary residence through the end of 2010.

The bill, introduced by Howard Coble (R-N.C.), extends the current tax break to anyone “who purchases a principal residence” through Jan. 1, 2011. It also lifts the income limitation (currently, singles earning more than $75,000 and couples earning more than $150,000 are disqualified) but keeps the $8,000 maximum credit, depending on the value of the home.

The bill extends the repayment waiver to account for the extended credit availability. Current law states the tax credit does not have to be repaid unless the home owner sells the property or no longer uses it as a primary residence within 36 months of purchase. Extending the waiver, according to Coble, provides fair treatment of home owners that purchase within the extended deadline.

And all of this, Coble says, encourages home ownership and sparks the housing market as well as the economy:

“As we have seen in the past, when the real estate market is thriving, so is the rest of our economy. Now we are experiencing the dire consequences of a slumping housing market. I believe our HOME Act of 2009 would convince many who are sitting on the fence right now to climb down and purchase a new home. Our entire economy would be the beneficiary of these new sales. Extending the tax credit to all home purchases could be just the boost our housing market needs.”

He’s not alone in pushing for broader financial incentives for home purchases. Georgia State governor Sonny Perdue on May 11 signed HB 261 into law, making up to $1,800 (or 1.2% of the purchase price, whichever is less) in tax credit available to home buyers. The state tax credit, taken over three years, is in excess of the federal tax credit for qualifying first-time home buyers. It applies to all home buyers within six months of the law’s enactment.

The Federal Housing Administration recently began allowing home buyers to “monetize” the federal home buyer tax credit toward closing costs on FHA-insured mortgages. The credit cannot count as the buyer’s minimum 3.5% down payment, but can be put toward other closing costs up front through a short-term loan the borrower repays after filing his or her income tax return.

The efforts to broaden the availability of federal dollars toward home purchases looks socially responsible on paper, especially as underwriting standards among lenders across the nation have tightened since the housing bubble fallout began.

But the principle of taxpayer money incentives for (albeit qualifying) borrowers to obtain government-insured mortgages raises questions, namely:

If the tax credit’s intended audience would not otherwise purchase a home outside of thousands of dollars from Uncle Sam, doesn’t it create somewhat of a false housing demand?

The broad argument surrounding the cause of the housing bubble generally states that risky lending practices allowed people into home ownership who could not reasonably afford payments. What began this year as a temporary stimulus to get the housing market on its feet again looks to turn into a broad tax credit for just about anyone that purchases a home, if Coble’s bill gains momentum.

Even if house prices increase under a permanent housing stimulus, they would stem from an exaggerated level of demand, so a government-subsidized housing bubble may be in the works.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Visit Brian on LinkedIn

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Enter your email address here for updates:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

© 2009 Huddleston Law Offices